Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare
  • Home
  • Team
  • Case Studies
    • EI and Loneliness
    • EI in Vaccine Policy
    • Silence and EI in Bipolar
    • Contested Credibility
    • Prejudicing Paranoia
    • Discounting Dementia
    • Bypassing Brain Injury
  • Blog
  • Events and CFP's
    • EPIC Seminar series
    • Talks by EPIC team
    • EPIC Events
    • Call for Papers
    • EPIC launch event
  • Outputs
    • Academic publications
    • Other publications
    • Policy Documents
    • Annual Reports
  • Public engagement
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Leaflets and Posters
    • Gallery
  • FOE
  • More
    • Home
    • Team
    • Case Studies
      • EI and Loneliness
      • EI in Vaccine Policy
      • Silence and EI in Bipolar
      • Contested Credibility
      • Prejudicing Paranoia
      • Discounting Dementia
      • Bypassing Brain Injury
    • Blog
    • Events and CFP's
      • EPIC Seminar series
      • Talks by EPIC team
      • EPIC Events
      • Call for Papers
      • EPIC launch event
    • Outputs
      • Academic publications
      • Other publications
      • Policy Documents
      • Annual Reports
    • Public engagement
      • Videos
      • Podcasts
      • Leaflets and Posters
      • Gallery
    • FOE
Epistemic Injustice in Healthcare
  • Home
  • Team
  • Case Studies
    • EI and Loneliness
    • EI in Vaccine Policy
    • Silence and EI in Bipolar
    • Contested Credibility
    • Prejudicing Paranoia
    • Discounting Dementia
    • Bypassing Brain Injury
  • Blog
  • Events and CFP's
    • EPIC Seminar series
    • Talks by EPIC team
    • EPIC Events
    • Call for Papers
    • EPIC launch event
  • Outputs
    • Academic publications
    • Other publications
    • Policy Documents
    • Annual Reports
  • Public engagement
    • Videos
    • Podcasts
    • Leaflets and Posters
    • Gallery
  • FOE

Bypassing Brain Injury

 

The case study explores how epistemic injustice may manifest in the context of brain injury. It will focus specifically on acquired and traumatic brain injury (ABI and TBI), examining how both testimonial and hermeneutical injustice arise in patient–healthcare professional interactions, as well as structurally within rehabilitation and legal settings. To investigate this, qualitative methods will be deployed, including semi-structured interviews and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). In patient–healthcare professional interactions, changes in memory, language or behaviour following ABI or TBI shape communication and credibility. 


 Team members

  • Data collection and analysis: Kate Lynch (University of Birmingham)
  • EPIC Project investigators: Professor Lisa Bortolotti and Professor Matthew Broome (University of Birmingham)



This project was generously funded by wellcome. Grant : [226603/Z/22/Z], 'EPIC: Epistemic Injustice in Health Care'.

  • Home
  • Team
  • EPIC Seminar series
  • Academic publications
  • Other publications

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept